Sunday (as part of a message on 1 Peter 3:8-17) I referred to the Gainesville State
School’s final football game of 2010. For
more on that story, check out the first video on Ann Voskamp’s post, “Why the
crazy sacrifices are worth it…”, available here.
Monday, October 22, 2012
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Two Extremes
Reference: Institutes of the Christian Religion, 4.20.1
When it
comes to politics, John Calvin argues that Christians are at risk of
gravitating to one of two extremes. He claims
that his theological reflection on civil government is necessary because
“… on
the one hand, frantic and barbarous men are furiously endeavouring to overturn
the order established by God, and, on the other, the flatterers of princes,
extolling their power without measure, hesitate not to oppose it to the
government of God.”
In
other words, we either assume that human government is inherently at odds with
God’s will and therefore dismiss it; or we assume that a particular government
is so aligned with God’s will that we can't see the ways the two may be at odds.
Calvin points
out the folly of Christians who believe that their primary loyalty to Christ excuses
them from obligation to civil law. Here
Calvin echoes the Apostle Peter, who says,
Live as free people, but do not use your
freedom as a cover-up for evil; live as God’s slaves. Show proper respect
to everyone, love the family of believers, fear God, honor the emperor. (1 Peter 2:16-17)
Calvin
argues that a societal rule of law is essential to human life:
“But we
shall have a fitter opportunity of speaking of the use of civil government. All
we wish to be understood at present is, that it is perfect barbarism to think
of exterminating it, its use among men being not less than that of bread and
water, light and air, while its dignity is much more excellent.”
His point
is that in a broken world in which people are naturally inclined toward
disorder and self-interest, God ordains and blesses the implementation of
structures that impose order. Calvin
goes so far as to say “that they [civil magistrates] are invested with divine
authority”. This is consistent with what
Peter says in 1 Peter 2:13-25, as well as the words of Psalm 82, quoted by
Jesus in John 10:34-35. The basic gist
of this scriptural argument is that all authority in heaven and earth belongs
to God; therefore any authority wielded by a person is authority that God has,
for the time, granted.
That
does not mean that everyone who wields authority does it in a way that honors
God. Calvin cautions Christians never to
mistake an earthly kingdom for the Kingdom of God:
“…it
matters not what your condition is among men, nor under what laws you live,
since in them the kingdom of Christ does not at all consist.”
His
words are intended as a comfort to those living under a government or culture that
challenges the Christian faith.
They are also intended as a warning to those who believe their
government will usher in the Kingdom of God.
This is a very important caution to Christians within our culture who believe
that a particular political party will better serve the cause of the church. Parties may endorse values such
as moral restraint or social justice which are consistent with the Kingdom,
but at the same time champion personal greed or the use of oppressive force to achieve its ends, which are at
odds with the Kingdom. Calvin says, simply, no
human kingdom is or ever will be the Kingdom of God. Don’t place hopes and expectations on your
government that rightfully belong to God.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Getting Political?
Passage: 1 Peter 2:13-25
Last
week I preached the first of two messages on 1 Peter 2:13-3:7. This is the passage in which Peter tells the
church to submit. In the first section,
Peter tells all Christians to submit to every human authority. He then goes so far as to tell slaves to
submit to their masters. If you’re
interested in hearing my treatment of the passage, you can listen here.
Peter
forces us to reflect on a topic we’re either too eager to avoid or too eager to
engage: politics. When we avoid
politics, we use the excuse that the realms of church and politics should never
overlap. When we engage politics, we’re
tempted to do so through the lens of our cultural biases. Peter prohibits Christians from doing
either. We can’t withdraw from a world
governed by human authorities. But if we
are to engage this world, we have to do so as citizens of heaven.
John
Calvin provides very timely insight in the last section of his Institutes of the Christian Religion. For the next week or two I’ll give summaries
of Calvin’s take on the intersection of the church and civil authority. I’ll also provide links, in case you want to go directly to the source
(highly recommended).
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Reclaimed
This past
Sunday I referred to an artist named Vik Muniz, and his 2008 work with
professional trash scavengers (or catadores)
at Rio de Janeiro’s Jardim Gramacho. At
the time, Jardim Gramacho was the highest-volume landfill in the world, and was
home to 13,000 people who scraped out a living salvaging recyclables. Muniz went to Jardim Gramacho looking to meet
these catadores and incorporate their
stories into some kind of art installation.
His project is chronicled in the 2010 documentary Waste Land (it’s available through Netflix, and probably your local
library and video store. Watch it. Seriously.).
At the beginning of the film, Muniz says, “What I do with my art is take
people away from where they are and show them a different world; then give them
a chance to look back at where they are differently.” Muniz proceeds to explore a corner of
the world that is home not only to the detritus of an enormous city but also to
a community of discarded people. Muniz
asks these people their names. He
befriends them. And he starts taking
their pictures. He goes on to stage
photos modeled after famous masterpieces, with a group of catadores as his subjects.
After the
photos have been taken, Muniz invites the subjects to join him at a warehouse,
where he projects their photos onto the floor.
They bring in barrels full of materials they have scavenged from the
landfill. And they use the materials to
outline and fill in their projected images.
The end results are warehouse-sized masterpieces rendered in trash.
And for
the first time in their lives, the subjects of these masterpieces – the professional
trashpickers – see themselves not as rejects but as objects of beauty. Muniz
goes on to do much more with the images they’ve rendered, and opens frontiers
for his subjects they wouldn’t have dreamed possible.
What Muniz does at Jardim Gramacho is what God offers to do with each of us. In 1 Peter 2:4-10, the Apostle talks about us
as “living stones” – discarded building materials that become a masterpiece in
the hands of the Creator. At the end of
the film, one of Muniz’s subjects says, “When I became a trash picker, I was so
ashamed. But then I met Vik. And I became part of his art. Now I’m not ashamed anymore.” God seeks out those of us who are
imperfect. Or incomplete. Who may have been marginalized or rejected. And invites us to become part of his life-changing project
of reclamation and redemption.
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Born Again
This
past Sunday our message was based on 1 Peter 1:13-2:3 (you can listen to it
here).
The passage is a meditation on new life in Jesus Christ – a life of
being purchased from slavery and born again as new people. As these are the central themes of the
Christian life, there’s no end of available material for illustration. That being said, here’s a tremendous story of rebirth and life transformation that one of my favorite theologians, Ann
Voskamp, referenced on her blog. Check it out.
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
I'm Changing My Diet
Peter
says the following in 1 Peter 2:1-3:
Therefore, rid yourselves of all malice
and all deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and slander of every kind. Like newborn
babies, crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in
your salvation, now that you have tasted that the Lord is good.
Peter's telling the church to stop consuming spiritual foods that malnourish us. In my message on this passage, I highlighted the fact that our life before Christ is driven by the
conviction that this life is all we've got. This in turn forces us to prioritize two
things:
Survival
– the need to extend our lifespans using any means necessary;
Success
– the need to acquire for ourselves everything we can using any means
necessary.
Peter
identifies spiritual “foods” that serve these two priorities:
Malice –advancing our ends
by hurting others.
Deceit – distorting the
truth for selfish purposes.
Hypocrisy – falsely
representing ourselves as better than we really are.
Envy – wanting to possess what someone else has.
Slander – making others look
bad to make ourselves feel good.
When we
resort to these, we may in fact extend our lifespans; we may even derive
maximal enjoyment, prosperity and security for our 70 plus years of life. But our lives will become self-fulfilling
prophecies – there will be nothing left for us when our days on earth come to
an end.
Jesus
Christ offers his disciples a source of life that cannot be extinguished – the
Spirit of God. Peter reminds the church
that they have received this life source, too.
The Spirit that raised Jesus from the dead lives in them. This being the case, says Peter, don’t
malnourish it. Don’t consume spiritual
junk food. Feed on “the living Word of
God” (1:23), and live.
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
What are you worried about?
Passage:
Matthew 6:19-34
This week
I’m preparing a sermon on 1 Peter 1:3-9 (as part of a series on the letters of
Peter entitled “Holy”. Find out more
here). Peter’s focus in this passage is “an
inheritance that won’t spoil or fade”.
My preparation has brought to mind Jesus’ two-part exhortation in the
Sermon on the Mount. In this passage
Jesus both reminds us of the fleeting nature of life in this world, and invites
us to trust in a God who knows our needs and loves us immensely. Above all, our faith
directs our focus not to the worries of making today the best it can be, but
preparing for an eternity that’s better than the best we can imagine. Francis Chan, one of my favorites, puts it
way better than I ever could. Take five
minutes to listen to what he has to say.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)